What is LLM red teaming?
LLM red teaming is the structured, adversarial testing of AI systems. Testers deliberately attack a model or AI application with jailbreaks, prompt-injection payloads, data-extraction attempts and abuse scenarios in order to find failures before real users or attackers do.
What red teaming looks for
Typical objectives include hijacking the application through direct or indirect prompt injection, bypassing safety rules with jailbreaks, and extracting sensitive material such as system prompts, retrieved documents or other users’ data. Testers also probe for harmful, defamatory or off-brand output under pressure, and for abuse of connected tools. Tool abuse is the highest-stakes failure for agentic systems that can send, write or execute.
How it is done
Effective red teaming combines two approaches: scenario-driven manual probing by people who understand both the business and attacker techniques, and automated suites that run large libraries of known attack patterns on every release. It targets the application as a whole, not just the model. The same model can be safe in one pipeline and exploitable in another, depending on prompts, retrieval and tool wiring. Findings are ranked by impact, fixed, and retested.
When to red team
Three moments matter. Before launch, to catch design-level flaws while they are cheap to fix. After significant changes, because a new tool, data source or model version can silently reopen closed holes. And periodically in production, because attack techniques evolve quickly. Red teaming complements classic penetration testing rather than replacing it; an infrastructure can be hardened while the AI layer remains exposed.
How is red teaming different from penetration testing?
Penetration testing targets infrastructure, networks and application code. LLM red teaming targets model behaviour: what the system can be talked into saying or doing. AI applications need both, because they fail in different layers.
How often should we red team an AI application?
Before launch, after any significant change to prompts, tools, data sources or models, and on a recurring cadence. Quarterly is a common baseline for systems handling sensitive data, with automated attack suites running far more often.
Who should perform it?
People independent of the team that built the system, whether an internal security function or an external specialist. Builders testing their own work consistently miss the failure modes they did not imagine while building.
- Prompt injectionPrompt injection is an attack that hides malicious instructions inside content an AI system processes, such as an email, a document or a web page. The model then treats the attacker’s text as instructions and ignores the rules it was given. The OWASP Top 10 for LLM applications ranks it as the leading security risk for this type of system.
- Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a technique that connects a language model to your own knowledge sources. When a user asks a question, the system first retrieves the most relevant documents, then passes them to the model alongside the question. The answer is grounded in your data instead of relying only on what the model learned during training.
- EU AI ActThe EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) is the world’s first comprehensive law regulating artificial intelligence. It entered into force in August 2024 and applies in stages. The Act classifies AI systems by risk level, from prohibited practices to strictly regulated high-risk systems, with lighter transparency duties for uses such as chatbots.
Deploy AI with confidence
Code75 implements production AI across enterprise teams, with the security testing and governance to match. You will talk to an engineer.